![]() ![]() This has made a night and day difference in AX200 performance. The AX10 is just fine upstairs (where, frankly, it will be used mostly for smartphone and tablet connections) and the AX20 is better downstairs (covering my office and rec room, where I test with various PCs, Laptops, Compute Sticks and NUCs). I read a post here that indicated that the 150MHz channel width made all the difference, so I swapped the two routers. I found that, despite the distance away, connecting to the AX20 upstairs was better than connecting to the AX10 downstairs (just a few feet away). ![]() ![]() Originally, I put the AX20 upstairs, mostly because I didn't want the hassle of having to reconfigure the AX10. I wanted better whole-house coverage, so I purchased a second unit, this time the AX20 (AX1800, 150MHz channels width), but only because 'I got a deal' (I am way too frugal (ok, cheap) for my own good). In a very short time, I went from nice 5GHz AX connections to awful 2.4GHz N connections. It worked great for a while, but then Intel released a slew of (Windows) driver updates and the connections started getting worse and worse. I originally cheaped-out and purchased the AX10 (AX1500). Which tp-link device are you referring to? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |